Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 15 Summary of differences in correlations with context constructs: mathematics

From: On the use of rotated context questionnaires in conjunction with multilevel item response models

Country Construct Rotation design Corr. with rotation result SEr Corr. with original result SEo
Colombia ENVPERC Samecorrjoint 0.13 0.02 0.16 0.03
  GENSCIE Hilocorrsep 0.07 0.02 0.11 0.02
  INTSCIE Hilocorrjoint −0.08 0.02 −0.12 0.02
   Common −0.08 0.02 −0.12 0.02
  SCIEEFF Hilocorrjoint 0.17 0.02 0.21 0.02
France ENVOPT Hilocorrsep −0.27 0.02 −0.30 0.02
  INTSCIE Hilocorrjoint 0.30 0.01 0.33 0.01
  SCINTACT Hilocorrjoint −0.15 0.02 −0.19 0.02
   Hilocorrsep −0.16 0.02 −0.19 0.02
Germany None      
Hong Kong SAR GENSCIE Samecorrsep 0.20 0.02 0.17 0.02
Jordan JOYSCIE Samecorrsep 0.18 0.02 0.21 0.02
   Hilocorrjoint 0.18 0.02 0.21 0.02
  SCIEEFF Hilocorrjoint 0.16 0.02 0.19 0.02
Norway SCINVEST Hilocorrsep −0.26 0.02 −0.29 0.01
Poland JOYSCIE Samecorrjoint 0.12 0.01 0.15 0.02
  SCIEACT Common 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01
  SCSCIE Samecorrjoint 0.18 0.01 0.22 0.02
Russian ENVAWARE Hilocorrsep 0.29 0.02 0.32 0.02
Federation SCSCIE Hilocorrjoint 0.09 0.02 0.12 0.02
United States None      
  1. Notes: Only differences between correlation coefficients exceeding 0.03 are reported.
  2. SEr: Standard error of the correlation between the construct and the rotation result.
  3. SEo: Standard error of the correlation between the construct and the original result.
  4. Bolded cell: Correlation coefficient between construct and rotation result is higher than the correlation between construct and original result.