Fig. 1
From: Inequality in remote learning quality during COVID-19: student perspectives and mitigating factors
Cross-country Comparisons of Remote Learning Quality Scales and Indicator.
aData may not be representative of target population. Notes: 95% confidence intervals are presented as error bars around mean estimates. The Access to Quality Technology indicator (top panel) shows the share of students with a positive value on the measure. Each scale (second and third panel) has an international average of 0 (represented by the horizontal line) and a standard deviation of 1 after applying senate weights. Probability weights have been applied and jackknife standard errors have been calculated in all countries except in Denmark, Ethiopia, and Kenya. Standard errors calculated for Denmark, Ethiopia, and Kenya account for clustering of observations within schools. Due to lack of scalar invariance, averages on the Self-Efficacy in Technology Use scale are not presented. DNK = Denmark, ETH = Ethiopia, KEN = Kenya, RUS = Russian Federation, SVN = Slovenia, ARE = United Arab Emirates, UZB = Uzbekistan