Does the material well-being at schools successfully compensate for socioeconomic disadvantages? Analysis of resilient schools in Sweden

Siebecke, Deborah Elin; Jarl, Maria

doi:10.1186/s40536-022-00130-y

Large-scale Assessments in Education

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 5 Within-group median, mean and standard deviation of material well-being variables for all groups and cycles

From: Does the material well-being at schools successfully compensate for socioeconomic disadvantages? Analysis of resilient schools in Sweden

		Teacher Shortage			Teachers fully certified			Shortage of Material Resources			Computer availability			Extracurricular Activities
		Median	Mean	SD	Median	Mean	SD	Median	Mean	SD	Median	Mean	SD	Median	Mean	SD
2000	Group 1	0.89	0.90	0.65	0.90	0.86	0.18	0.46	0.37	0.74	0.11	0.13	0.07
	Group 2	1.15	0.94	0.85	0.84	0.83	0.09	0.29	0.00	0.91	0.13	0.14	0.03
	Group 3	−0.17	0.13	1.04	0.92	0.90	0.09	–0.08	–0.09	0.94	0.11	0.12	0.05
	Group 4	–0.17	0.05	0.84	0.89	0.87	0.12	0.10	0.17	0.67	0.13	0.14	0.08
	Group 5	–0.17	–0.13	0.85	0.93	0.91	0.11	0.02	–0.10	0.91	0.14	0.19	0.24
	Group 6	0.46	0.46	1.99	0.90	0.90	0.10	–0.37	–0.37	2.17	0.14	0.14	0.01
	Total	0.27	0.26	0.98	0.91	0.88	0.12	0.11	0.02	0.89	0.12	0.14	0.13
2003	Group 1	0.35	0.29	1.11	0.85	0.85	0.10	–0.06	–0.19	0.90	0.14	0.15	0.07
	Group 2	0.26	0.24	0.73	0.89	0.84	0.13	–0.06	–0.09	0.69	0.13	0.14	0.03
	Group 3	0.07	0.02	0.98	0.90	0.86	0.15	–0.21	0.13	0.90	0.13	0.15	0.06
	Group 4	0.07	0.06	0.72	0.88	0.86	0.10	0.02	0.19	0.63	0.16	0.16	0.05
	Group 5	0.07	0.09	1.01	0.94	0.90	0.10	0.10	0.06	1.10	0.13	0.15	0.07
	Group 6	–0.69	–0.69	0.73	0.85	0.85	0.08	–0.21	–0.21	0.00	0.16	0.16	0.02
	Total	0.07	0.09	0.95	0.91	0.87	0.11	–0.06	0.05	0.90	0.14	0.15	0.06
2006	Group 1	–0.25	–0.10	0.86	0.93	0.93	0.06	0.09	–0.01	0.46	0.15	0.17	0.07
	Group 2	0.17	–0.07	0.85	0.90	0.86	0.17	–0.39	–0.21	0.93	0.16	0.21	0.18
	Group 3	–0.25	–0.20	0.72	0.93	0.92	0.07	–0.23	0.10	0.97	0.14	0.15	0.10
	Group 4	–1.06	–0.38	0.95	0.94	0.92	0.07	–0.07	0.09	0.98	0.13	0.14	0.05
	Group 5	–1.06	–0.63	0.55	0.96	0.92	0.15	0.09	0.23	0.78	0.15	0.17	0.06
	Group 6	–1.06	–0.89	0.41	0.97	0.92	0.09	–0.07	–0.11	0.38	0.14	0.13	0.03
	Total	–0.25	–0.32	0.79	0.94	0.91	0.11	–0.08	0.06	0.88	0.14	0.16	0.10
2009	Group 1	–0.26	–0.14	0.77	0.81	0.82	0.11	–0.13	0.04	0.77	0.49	0.64	0.62	6.00	5.78	1.99
	Group 2	–0.26	–0.31	0.68	0.92	0.89	0.12	–0.27	–0.28	0.75	0.33	0.40	0.26	6.00	5.63	2.33
	Group 3	–0.26	–0.26	0.68	0.95	0.93	0.09	0.19	0.13	0.81	0.38	0.50	0.45	6.00	5.74	2.10
	Group 4	–0.26	–0.44	0.60	0.95	0.93	0.07	–0.27	–0.13	0.68	0.32	0.37	0.20	6.00	6.06	1.94
	Group 5	–1.02	–0.50	0.70	0.95	0.91	0.17	0.03	0.24	0.81	0.35	0.47	0.34	6.00	5.68	2.21
	Group 6	–0.26	–0.12	0.74	0.80	0.81	0.23	–0.13	–0.11	0.58	0.36	0.53	0.55	5.00	4.43	2.07
	Total	–0.26	–0.34	0.68	0.95	0.90	0.13	–0.13	0.01	0.78	0.35	0.46	0.37	6.00	5.71	2.13
2012	Group 1	–0.28	–0.24	0.97	0.92	0.88	0.09	–0.17	–0.45	0.61	0.50	0.44	0.16	5.00	5.14	1.35
	Group 2	0.15	0.23	0.88	0.90	0.90	0.08	0.02	–0.06	0.71	0.51	0.66	0.53	4.00	4.05	2.13
	Group 3	–0.28	–0.03	0.91	0.94	0.90	0.16	0.22	0.08	0.66	0.66	0.65	0.35	4.00	4.36	1.71
	Group 4	0.15	0.03	0.77	0.92	0.87	0.21	0.02	–0.06	0.82	0.48	0.57	0.36	4.00	4.18	1.75
	Group 5	–0.28	–0.16	0.78	0.97	0.90	0.18	0.22	0.34	1.07	0.68	0.75	0.38	5.00	4.91	1.65
	Group 6	–1.09	–0.71	0.66	0.95	0.88	0.23	0.02	0.35	0.71	0.84	0.70	0.31	5.00	4.46	2.33
	Total	0.15	–0.04	0.85	0.94	0.89	0.17	0.02	0.05	0.82	0.54	0.64	0.40	4.00	4.37	1.85
2015	Group 1	0.71	0.61	0.38	0.92	0.89	0.04	0.74	0.34	1.18	1.00	1.04	0.36	4.00	4.60	1.82
	Group 2	0.97	0.77	0.90	0.89	0.86	0.17	–0.40	–0.20	0.95	1.00	0.93	0.50	4.00	3.38	1.65
	Group 3	0.29	0.33	0.96	0.93	0.87	0.21	–0.13	–0.12	0.82	1.00	0.89	0.50	4.00	4.08	1.89
	Group 4	0.46	0.31	1.06	0.92	0.86	0.21	–0.48	–0.37	0.77	1.00	0.94	0.37	4.00	4.09	1.80
	Group 5	0.02	0.02	1.19	0.91	0.80	0.28	–0.65	–0.48	0.69	1.00	0.94	0.52	5.00	5.00	1.95
	Group 6	0.41	0.28	0.52	0.86	0.86	0.12	–0.50	–0.52	0.60	1.00	1.03	0.07	4.00	4.75	2.99
	Total	0.48	0.36	1.04	0.91	0.85	0.17	–0.33	–0.28	0.83	1.00	0.93	0.46	4.00	4.16	1.91
2018	Group 1	0.59	0.77	0.55	0.81	0.77	0.29	–0.07	–0.08	0.71	1.00	0.84	0.24	4.50	4.83	2.37
	Group 2	0.97	0.75	0.96	0.75	0.71	0.22	–0.45	–0.40	0.88	1.00	0.96	0.23	4.00	3.51	1.82
	Group 3	0.50	0.37	0.99	0.85	0.81	0.19	–0.31	–0.34	0.92	1.00	0.99	0.41	4.00	4.00	2.01
	Group 4	0.43	0.41	1.14	0.83	0.75	0.26	–0.69	–0.40	1.09	1.00	1.04	0.43	4.00	4.29	2.05
	Group 5	0.43	0.19	0.96	0.91	0.81	0.26	–0.94	0.75	0.76	1.00	1.14	1.19	4.00	4.57	2.07
	Group 6	1.22	1.22	0.45	0.68	0.68	0.09	0.47	0.47	0.52	1.30	1.30	0.42	1.50	1.50	2.12
	Total	0.58	0.44	1.00	0.83	0.78	0.23	–0.60	–0.43	0.92	1.00	1.03	0.68	4.00	4.12	2.05

Group 1: resilient; Group 2: non-resilient; Group 3: high-achieving, medium ESCS; Group 4: low-achieving, medium ESCS; Group 5: high-achieving, high ESCS; Group 6: low-achieving, high ESCS; positive values for teacher shortage and shortage of material resources refer to higher exposure to shortages than OECD average, values for teachers fully certified reflect percentages, computer availability is expressed as a ratio of computers per student, and values for extracurricular activities refer to total number of selected activities offered at schools (see “Variables” for a detailed description)

Back to article page