Skip to main content

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 2 Outcome variable, measures for students’ perceived supportive climate, and control variables used in the present study

From: Supportive climates and science achievement in the Nordic countries: lessons learned from the 2015 PISA study

Variable

# items

Item stimulus

Item example

Response categories

Description

Science achievement as a student-level outcome variable

 PVSCIE (student science achievement)

10

Probability scores to represent achievement

 

Continuous scale

A set of 10 plausible values—PV1SCIE-PV10SCIE

Predictors for supportive climate at the student level from the student questionnaire

 TEACHSUP (perceived teacher support in science classes)

5

How often do these things happen in your science lessons?

“The teachers show an interest in every student’s learning.”

4-point scale (1 = Every lesson to 4 = Never or hardly ever)

Index based on IRT scaling (Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.88 to 0.93 in Nordic countries). A positive index corresponds to students’ perceiving that their teachers support their learning

 FAIR (ateacher fairness, reversed variable Unfairteacher)

6

During the past 12 months, how often did you have the following experiences at school?

“Teachers called on me less often than they called on other students.”

4-point scale (1 = Almost never to 4 = Once a week or more)

Scale with means of six items

 PERFEED (perceived feedback from science teachers)

5

How often do these things happen in your science lessons?

“The teacher gives me feedback on my strengths in this subject.”

4-point scale (1 = Never or almost never to 4 = Every lesson or almost every lesson)

Index based on IRT scaling (Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.90 to 0.94 in Nordic countries). A positive index corresponds to students’ perceiving that their teachers provide regular feedback

 DISCLISCI (class discipline in science classes)

5

How often do these things happen in your science class?

“There is noise and disorder.”

4-point scale (1 = Every lesson to 4 = Never or hardly ever)

Index based on IRT scaling (Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.88 to 0.91in Nordic countries). A high index corresponds to a more positive class discipline

Student-level control variables from the student questionnaire

 Gender of the student

1

Are you a girl or a boy?

1 of 2 response options

PISA categories: Girl = 1, Boy = 2

Recoded as Girl = 0, Boy = 1

 Immigration background (IMMIG1, IMMIG2)

3

In which country

- were you born?

- was your mother born?

- was your father born?

4 response options e.g., born in the country of PISA-test

PISA categories: native (1) if born in country, second-generation student (2), and first-generation immigrant (3) if born outside

Used dummy coding:

For IMMIG1, first-generation = 0, native = 1

For IMMIG2, second-generation = 0, native = 1

 ESCS (the socio-economic profile of the student)

9

What is your

- parents’ highest level of education?

- parents’ highest occupational status?

- family wealth?

For family wealth e.g., household items, number of books at home, and educational resources

PISA index is a composite score derived from indicators via Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Used as an index

(scale standardised to have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one.)

 EDUASPIR (student’s aspirations for future education)

1

“Which educational achievement level do you expect to complete?”

6 response options: e.g., lower secondary, upper secondary to university level

PISA categories: ISCED 2, to ISCED 6

Used as percentage of students in different response categories

School-level control variables from the school questionnaire

 STUBEHA (student behaviour hindering learning)

5

To what degree is each of the following a problem among the students in your school?

“Student truancy (i.e. arriving late for school).”

4-point scale (1 = Not at all to 4 = a lot)

Index based on IRT scaling (Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.74 to 0.79 in Nordic countries)

 STRATIO (student/teacher ratio in school as an indicator of the availability of educational resources.)

2

How many—students are enrolled in grade 10 in your school?

- teachers are there at your school?

2 response categories

Derived by dividing the total number of full-time students by the total number of full-time teachers in PISA 2015

Used as school principals’ reports as a measure of the spare teacher resource capacity within schools

 SCHLTYPE (the type of school)

2

Is your school public or private?

What is the source of resources for funding?

“Private refers to schools managed directly or indirectly by a non-government organization.”

3 response categories based on school principals’ reports

Used as dummy coded:

As 0 = public, 1 = private (with or without funding)

 EDUSHORT (shortage of educational material in school hindering learning)

4

To what extent the school’s capacity to provide instruction was hindered?

“Lack of educational material (e.g. textbooks, IT equipment, library, or lab-oratory material).”

4-point scale (1 = Not at all to 4 = a lot)

Index based on IRT scaling (Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.81to 0.88 in Nordic countries)

  1. See OECD (2016a, 2017b)
  2. ISCED International Standard Classification of Education
  3. aReversed to ensure the interpretation in a positive direction