Skip to main content

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 5 Summary of log-predictive scores and Kullback–Leibler divergences for boys and girls in the flexible priors setting

From: Bayesian probabilistic forecasting with large-scale educational trend data: a case study using NAEP

 

LPS

KLD

EBL

HG-3

HG-4

HG-UIP

HG-RIC

HG-BRIC

EBL

HG-3

HG-4

HG-UIP

HG-RIC

HG-BRIC

Boys

 Uniform

0.395*

0.402

0.410

0.398

0.397

0.398

0.098*

0.098

0.098

0.097

0.097

0.097

 Binomial (m = 2)

0.397

0.404

0.411

0.403

0.401

0.403

0.097

0.098

0.098

0.098

0.097

0.098

 Binomial (m = 4)

0.395*

0.403*

0.412*

0.397

0.395

0.397

0.098*

0.099*

0.099*

0.097

0.097

0.097

 Beta-binomial

0.397

0.405

0.412

0.407

0.405

0.412

0.097

0.098

0.099

0.098

0.097

0.098

Girls

 Uniform

0.397*

0.406

0.412

0.401

0.400

0.401

0.095

0.096

0.097

0.096

0.096

0.096

 Binomial (m = 2)

0.406

0.416

0.423

0.413

0.413

0.413

0.096

0.097

0.098

0.097

0.097

0.097

 Binomial (m = 4)

0.392*

0.400*

0.407*

0.394

0.394

0.394

0.095*

0.096*

0.096*

0.095

0.095

0.095

 Beta-binomial

0.394

0.403

0.410

0.401

0.394

0.401

0.096

0.096

0.097

0.096

0.096

0.096

  1. Values with * indicate that these analyses was based on fewer than the full 64 total possible models due to computational tolerances being reached in the calculation of likelihoods. In no case were fewer than 30 models used in the LPS and KLD calculations for these cases
  2. EBL: Local empirical Bayes; HG-3: Hyper-g prior with \(\alpha = 3\); HG-4: Hyper-g prior with \(\alpha = 4\); HG-UIP: Hyper-g prior with UIP setting; HG-RIC: Hyper-g prior with RIC setting; HG-BRIC: Hyper-g prior with BRIC setting. Uniform: uniform model prior; Binomial (m = 2): Binomial model prior with model size = 2; Binomial (m = 4): Binomial model prior with model size = 4; Beta-binomial: Beta-binomial model prior