Table 2 Number of items according to the fit of the two-class FMM to the item RT data, by cluster position
| Cluster position | Two-class FMM fits well | Number of items |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No | 4 |
| Yes | 179 (97.81%) | |
| 2 | No | 5 |
| Yes | 178 (97.27%) | |
| 3 | No | 5 |
| Yes | 178 (97.27%) | |
| 4 | No | 4 |
| Yes | 179 (97.81%) |