Skip to main content

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 6 Total, direct and indirect effects of immigrant status on planning a career in science (0–1)

From: Immigrant optimism or immigrant pragmatism? Linguistic capital, orientation towards science and occupational expectations of adolescent immigrants

 

1. Immigrant (total effect)

2. Immigrant (direct effect) Path C in Fig. 1c

3. Immigrant (indirect effect)

4. Indirect effect due to instrumental motivation

5. Indirect effect due to enjoyment of science

6. Instrumental motivation to study science Path D in Fig. 1c

7. Enjoyment of science Path E in Fig. 1c

8. % total effect explained

9. % total effect explained in PISA 2006

 

Coeff

SE

Coeff

SE

Coeff

SE

Coeff

SE

Coeff

SE

Coeff

SE

Coeff

SE

%

%

Australia

0.10

0.01

0.07

0.01

0.03

0.01

0.02

0.00

0.010

0.002

0.14

0.00

0.05

0.01

32%

37%

Austria

0.08

0.02

0.06

0.02

0.02

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.012

0.003

0.07

0.01

0.03

0.01

25%

27%

Belgium

0.09

0.02

0.06

0.02

0.04

0.01

0.03

0.01

0.011

0.004

0.13

0.01

0.04

0.01

39%

67%

Canada

0.13

0.01

0.09

0.01

0.04

0.01

0.03

0.00

0.011

0.002

0.17

0.01

0.05

0.01

32%

44%

Denmark

0.22

0.02

0.17

0.02

0.05

0.01

0.04

0.01

0.016

0.004

0.12

0.01

0.04

0.01

23%

34%

France

0.14

0.02

0.09

0.02

0.05

0.01

0.04

0.01

0.012

0.003

0.14

0.01

0.04

0.01

37%

48%

Germany

0.10

0.02

0.10

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.006

0.002

0.09

0.01

0.03

0.01

0%

0%

Great Britain

0.16

0.02

0.11

0.02

0.05

0.01

0.04

0.01

0.009

0.003

0.16

0.01

0.03

0.01

33%

44%

Greece

0.00

0.02

− 0.02

0.02

0.02

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.007

0.002

0.08

0.01

0.04

0.01

na

44

Ireland

0.17

0.02

0.16

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.01

0.006

0.002

0.15

0.01

0.03

0.01

5%

78%

Israel

0.00

0.02

0.01

0.02

− 0.01

0.01

− 0.01

0.01

− 0.004

0.004

0.10

0.01

0.07

0.01

na

na

Luxembourg

0.05

0.02

0.04

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.004

0.002

0.11

0.01

0.04

0.01

19%

30%

Netherlands

0.19

0.03

0.15

0.03

0.04

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.024

0.004

0.11

0.01

0.06

0.01

23%

10%

New Zealand

0.13

0.02

0.07

0.02

0.05

0.01

0.04

0.01

0.015

0.004

0.15

0.01

0.04

0.01

41%

58%

Norway

0.15

0.03

0.11

0.03

0.05

0.01

0.03

0.00

0.016

0.004

0.10

0.01

0.04

0.01

30%

46%

Spain

0.12

0.02

0.09

0.02

0.03

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.013

0.003

0.14

0.01

0.04

0.01

26%

58%

Sweden

0.21

0.02

0.15

0.02

0.06

0.01

0.02

0.00

0.033

0.005

0.08

0.01

0.06

0.01

27%

49%

Switzerland

0.06

0.02

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.005

0.002

0.11

0.01

0.03

0.01

14%

26%

United States

0.09

0.02

0.06

0.01

0.03

0.01

0.02

0.00

0.005

0.002

0.13

0.01

0.03

0.01

33%

28%

  1. Paths C, D, E from Fig. 1c. Control variables not reported to conserve space A. Estimates with BRR weights. PISA 2015 unless otherwise indicated
  2. Coefficients in bold are significantly different from zero at p = 0.05, Coeff denotes unstandardized coefficient, SE denotes standard error A Analyses for 2006 are in in Appendices S1 and S2, respectively. Other estimates in the full models for 2015 and 2006 are available upon request