Skip to main content

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 2 Results initial CFA analyses RQ1

From: Instructional quality: catalyst or pitfall in educational systems’ aim for high achievement and equity? An answer based on multilevel SEM analyses of TIMSS 2015 data in Flanders (Belgium), Germany, and Norway

 

Flanders

Germany

Norway

b (SE)

b (SE)

b (SE)

Model within

 Classroom management

  CM–CM1

.46*** (.02)

.56*** (.02)

.55*** (.02)

  CM–CM2

.63*** (.02)

.71*** (.01)

.75*** (.02)

  CM–CM3

.61*** (.02)

.71*** (.02)

.70*** (.02)

  CM–CM4

.40*** (.02)

.55*** (.02)

.39*** (.03)

  CM–CM5

.46*** (.02)

.60*** (.02)

.51*** (.03)

 Supportive climatea

  SC–SC1

.71*** (.02)

.61*** (.02)

.57*** (.02)

  SC–SC2

.68*** (.02)

.65*** (.02)

.54*** (.03)

  SC–SC3

.54*** (.02)

.64*** (.02)

.66*** (.02)

  SC–SC4

.70*** (.01)

.73*** (.02)

.64*** (.02)

  SC–SC5

.39*** (.02)

.41*** (.03)

.63*** (.02)

  SC–SC6

  

.66*** (.02)

  SC–SC7

  

.58*** (.02)

  SC–SC8

  

.64*** (.02)

  SC–SC9

  

.62*** (.02)

  SC–SC10

  

.54*** (.02)

 Cognitive activationb

  CA–CA1b

.74*** (.01)

.76*** (.02)

 

  CA–CA2

.29*** (.02)

.40*** (.03)

.64*** (.02)

  CA–CA3

.76*** (.02)

.78*** (.02)

.44*** (.02)

  CA–CA4b

.56*** (.02)

.57*** (.02)

 

  CA–CA5

.28*** (.02)

.36*** (.03)

.61*** (.02)

  CA–CA6b

  

.60*** (.02)

  CA–CA7

.26*** (.02)

.37*** (.03)

.55*** (.02)

 Correlations

  CM–SC

.15***

.15***

.10***

  CM–CA

− .26***

− .18***

.06

  SC–CA

.18***

.35***

.76***

Model between

 Classroom management

  CM–CM1

.96*** (.03)

.96*** (.02)

.97*** (.03)

  CM–CM2

.89*** (.03)

.99*** (.02)

.96*** (.02)

  CM–CM3

.89*** (.03)

.94*** (.02)

.93*** (.03)

  CM–CM4

.81*** (.06)

.92*** (.04)

.97*** (.05)

  CM–CM5

.83*** (.05)

.92*** (.03)

.91*** (.04)

 Supportive climatea

   

  SC–SC1

.83*** (.05)

.88*** (.06)

.97*** (.06)

  SC–SC2

.94*** (.04)

.88*** (.07)

.94*** (.08)

  SC–SC3

.99*** (.04)

.94*** (.05)

.88*** (.07)

  SC–SC4

.81*** (.06)

.93*** (.04)

.89*** (.06)

  SC–SC5

.75*** (.07)

.89*** (.08)

.97*** (.07)

  SC–SC6

  

.97*** (.06)

  SC–SC7

  

.97*** (.16)

  SC–SC8

  

.91*** (.07)

  SC–SC9

  

.81*** (.18)

  SC–SC10

  

.50*** (.18)

 Cognitive activationb

  CA–CA1b

.29 (.25)

.23** (.08)

 

  CA–CA2

.93*** (.05)

1.01*** (.07)

.99*** (.11)

  CA–CA3

.38 (.24)

− .36 (.85)

.38 (.26)

  CA–CA4b

.20 (.23)

.19 (.24)

 

  CA–CA5

.98*** (.08)

.81*** (.09)

.90*** (.09)

  CA–CA6b

  

.92*** (.07)

  CA–CA7

.74*** (.08)

.83*** (.10)

.82*** (.10)

 Correlations

  CM–SC

.33***

.18

.56***

  CM–CA

.08

.35**

.64***

  SC–CA

.83***

.96***

.82***

Model fit

RMSEA

.04

.05

.03

CFI

.83

.85

.93

SRMR within

.08

.08

.04

SRMR between

.21

.23

.12

Chi2 (df)

2168.35*** (202)

1948.74*** (202)

1443.72*** (334)

ICC

ICC[1]

ICC[2]

ICC[1]

ICC[2]

ICC[1]

ICC[2]

CM

.40

.92

.24

.82

.24

.86

SC

.13

.74

.10

.62

.14

.75

CAb

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.48

  1. *** p < .001; ** p < .01
  2. aAs stated in the paragraph 'Measures' under the heading of 'Research design', in Norway supportive climate was measured by different items. The items and accompanying numbering of items in the analyses of Norway stem from the item numbering in Appendix
  3. bFor the model to converge, in Flanders and Germany, item 6 had to be deleted; in Norway, item 1 and 4 had to be deleted