Skip to main content

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 3 Distribution of the three patterns of students’ computer use across the 21 education systems that participated in ICILS 2013

From: Patterns of students’ computer use and relations to their computer and information literacy: results of a latent class analysis and implications for teaching and learning

 

Cluster 1: low frequency use pattern (percent)

Cluster 2: average frequency use pattern (percent)

Cluster 3: high frequency use pattern (percent)

%

SE

Sign

%

SE

Sign

%

SE

Sign

Australia

6.0

0.51

79.1

0.88

14.9

0.77

Chile

8.4

0.67

80.0

0.98

11.6

0.78

Croatia

16.0

0.78

73.4

1.05

10.6

0.63

Czech Republic

9.5

0.69

80.3

0.84

10.2

0.70

Denmark

2.2

0.34

86.3

1.09

11.5

1.04

Germany

18.5

1.03

78.4

1.06

3.1

0.39

Hong Kong, SAR

17.3

1.41

72.1

1.28

10.5

0.96

Korea, Republic of

31.7

1.05

63.1

1.10

5.2

0.44

Lithuania

10.5

0.92

79.9

0.95

9.6

0.73

Netherlands

10.1

0.87

83.0

0.96

6.9

0.79

Norway

4.6

0.48

86.8

0.69

8.6

0.61

Poland

7.9

0.55

78.2

0.86

13.9

0.76

Russian Federation

5.6

0.60

66.2

1.08

28.2

1.06

Slovak Republic

6.8

0.67

77.1

0.96

16.1

0.86

Slovenia

8.3

0.66

81.5

0.94

10.1

0.67

Switzerland

16.5

1.16

80.2

1.40

3.3

0.70

Thailand

9.7

0.93

80.4

0.96

9.9

0.69

Turkey

16.3

1.10

67.1

1.24

16.6

0.94

Canada (Ontario)

7.5

0.60

79.6

0.85

12.8

0.78

Canada (Newfoundl. & Labrador)

11.5

1.13

77.5

1.64

11.0

1.08

Argentina, Buenos Aires

17.2

1.46

71.2

1.93

11.6

1.35

Average

11.5

0.19

 

77.2

0.24

 

11.3

0.18

 
  1. Comment: Significances in the percentages are calculated in comparison to the average frequency of each cluster. ( No significant difference to overall average, significantly lower percentage than the overall average, ▲ significantly higher percentage than the overall average)