Skip to main content

An IERI – International Educational Research Institute Journal

Table 2 Parameter estimates of performance decline and proficiency

From: Performance decline in low-stakes educational assessments: different mixture modeling approaches

 

nac

aca

Group comparisons

Est. (SE)

Est. (SE)

Wald’s χ 2 (df)

Distribution of latent classes

 Proportion of no-decline class (π I)

  2PDM

0.81 (0.01)

0.91 (0.01)

106.80 (1), p < 0.001

  HYBRID

0.62 (0.01)

0.82 (0.01)

226.86 (1), p < 0.001

  MPDM

0.48 (0.03)

0.68 (0.03)

41.60 (1), p < 0.001

 Shape parameter (ω)

  2PDM

   

  HYBRID

4.78 (0.15)

7.33 (0.27)

72.27 (1), p < 0.001

  MPDM

6.47 (0.26)

10.25 (0.47)

70.52 (1), p < 0.001

 Magnitude of PD

  2PDM

a

a

a

  HYBRID: response threshold (\(\tilde{\upbeta }\))

3.76 (0.18)

3.48 (0.31)

0.65 (1), p = 0.42

  MPDM: decrement (κ)

0.80 (0.04)

0.91 (0.07)

2.85 (1), p = 0.09

Proficiency distribution

 No-decline class: mean (μ I )

  2PDM

− 1.02 (0.03)

0b

1637.64 (1), < 0.001

  HYBRID

− 1.01 (0.03)

0b

1385.61 (1), p < 0.001

  MPDM

− 1.01 (0.03)

0b

1321.48 (1), p < 0.001

 No-decline class: standard deviation (σ)

  2PDM

0.82 (0.02)

1b

133.48 (1), p < 0.001

  HYBRID

0.82 (0.02)

1b

124.16 (1), p < 0.001

  MPDM

0.82 (0.02)

1b

127.80 (1), p < 0.001

 Decline classes

  2PDM: mean (\(\upmu_{{i_{0} }}\))

− 0.95 (0.04)

0.02 (0.08)

167.28 (1), p < 0.001

  HYBRID: slope (ρ)

− 0.01 (0.004)

− 0.05 (0.01)

17.29 (1), p < 0.001

  MPDM: slope (ρ)

− 0.01 (0.004)

− 0.03 (0.01)

5.66 (1), p = 0.02

  1. Note that parameters cannot be compared across models. See main text for more information
  2. nac: non-academic group; aca: academic group; 2PDM: multigroup two-class performance decline mode; HYBRID: multigroup HYBRID model; MPDM: multigroup multiclass performance decline model. All parameter estimates are group-specific
  3. aSee Fig. 3. b Parameters are fixed