Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 DIF parameter estimates for Korea and New Zealand data

From: Comparing DIF methods for data with dual dependency

  LR HLR Testlet Multilevel testlet
Number
 Item 1 0.014 0.014 0.005 0.012
 Item 2 −0.006 −0.007 −0.002 −0.007
 Item 3 0.000 −0.001 −0.002 −0.004
 Item 4 −0.006 −0.006 0.000 −0.010
 Item 5 0.006 0.007 0.002 0.008
 Item 6 0.005 0.005 0.002 0.003
 Item 7 −0.012 −0.012 −0.005 −0.014
 Item 8 −0.007 −0.007 0.004 0.003
Geometry
 Item 1 −0.005 −0.006 −0.011 −0.013
 Item 2 −0.010 −0.011 −0.007 −0.019
 Item 3 0.002 0.002 0.002 −0.005
 Item 4 0.007 0.008 0.001 −0.003
Data and chance
 Item 1 0.000 0.000 −0.001 0.000
 Item 2 0.017 0.017 0.005 0.009
 Item 3 −0.011 −0.012 −0.007 −0.017
 Item 4 0.003 0.040 0.000 0.002
Algebra
 Item 1 0.006 0.007 0.002 0.000
 Item 2 0.004 0.004 0.001 −0.004
 Item 3 0.003 0.003 0.002 −0.004
 Item 4 0.000 0.000 −0.003 −0.003
 Item 5 −0.004 −0.005 0.000 −0.009
  1. Italised DIF parameter estimates are significant at 5 %