|
OOO
|
R
|
RM
|
RMS
|
RS
|
RSM
|
S
|
SMR
|
SRM
|
MS
|
MSR
|
MRS
|
M
|
Within country profile heterogenity
|
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
Rather low
|
High
|
---|
Austria
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
| | | ✓ |
Czech Republic
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| | | ✓ |
Finland
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| ✓ | | |
Germany
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
| | | ✓ |
Hungary
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| ✓ | | |
Ireland
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| | ✓ | |
Italy
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| | ✓ | |
Lithuania
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
| ✓ | | |
Malta
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
3
| | | ✓ |
Northern Ireland
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
| ✓ | | |
Poland
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| ✓ | | |
Portugal
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
| | | ✓ |
Romania
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| | | ✓ |
Slovak Republic
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| | | ✓ |
Slovenia
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
| | | ✓ |
Spain
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
| | | ✓ |
Sweden
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
| | | ✓ |
International model
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
| | | ✓ |
-
Low five out of 7 similar; rather low different types but similar patterns of subject-specific strength; high different types and diverse subject-specific strengths and weaknesses