On the use of rotated context questionnaires in conjunction with multilevel item response models

Large-scale Assessments in Education

An IEA-ETS Research Institute Journal

Table 7 Differences in estimated means from the original scaling for reading for each of the alternative conditioning approaches

	Colombia	Germany	France	Hong Kong SAR	Jordan	Norway	Poland	Russian federation
common	0.1	0.4	0.2	1.0	−0.3	0.2	1.1	−0.3
Samecorrjoint	1.0	−2.2	−0.2	1.1	−0.6	0.6	0.6	−0.6
Samecorrsep	−2.6	−2.2	−1.6	0.6	−0.4	−0.1	−0.7	0.3
Hilocorrjoint	0.5	−2.0	−1.5	1.2	−0.8	−0.5	0.6	−0.2
Hilocorrsep	−1.8	−2.3	−0.4	1.0	−0.4	−0.5	−0.5	−0.3

Notes: Standard errors of the originally estimated means in reading range from 2 to 5 PISA points.
Due to an error in the printing of booklets, no reading estimates were available for the United States in PISA 2006.